Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video403 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Competitive Eating results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 194 hits. Analysis detected 851 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,612 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,529 of 16,562 topics). This Competitive Eating is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Competitive Eating
Topic details
Total words: 1,612
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.0%12.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.7%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos