Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,377 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Commuter Rail results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Pessimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 731 hits. Analysis detected 4,214 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,235 of 16,562 topics). This Commuter Rail is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
Commuter Rail
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,508
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510032.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos