Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video548 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Commuter Chaos results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 311 hits. Analysis detected 1,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,021 of 16,562 topics). This Commuter Chaos is worse (more manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
Commuter Chaos
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,192
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.6% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.2%14.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos