Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video959 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Watch And Rapid Response results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 46.1% saturation with 1,327 hits. Analysis detected 5,132 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,877 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,329 of 16,562 topics). This Community Watch And Rapid Response is worse (more manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group.
Community Watch And Rapid Response
Topic details
Total words: 2,877
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

92% percentile
025507510092.0% percentile
9.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 46.1%46.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 38.0%38.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 19.3%19.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 29.4%29.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 14.3%14.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 46.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 38.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 29.4%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos