Topic summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video3,661 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Response To Violence results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Emotion, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 980 hits. Analysis detected 6,529 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (20,399 of 21,106 topics). This Community Response To Violence is better (less manipulative) than 96.70% of the peer group.
Community Response To Violence
Topic details
Total words: 14,644
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

3% percentile
02550751003.3% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles14.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.0%0.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos