Topic summary
⁠57%2 analyzed articles/videos1,102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Policing results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 590 hits. Analysis detected 5,755 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,822 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (11,792 of 16,562 topics). This Community Policing is better (less manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Community Policing
Topic details
Total words: 6,822
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510028.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos