Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video534 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Debate results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 172 hits. Analysis detected 1,377 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,602 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,004 of 16,245 topics). This Community Debate is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Community Debate
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠63%Community Debate (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,602
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.0% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.2%10.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Middle Ground: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.1%Special Pleading: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Straw Man: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos