Topic summary
31%1 analyzed article/video851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Colleges results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 227 hits. Analysis detected 1,470 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,553 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 25% (11,659 of 15,437 topics). This Community Colleges is better (less manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Community Colleges
Topic details
Total words: 2,553
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510024.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos