Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 984 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community College results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 479 hits . Analysis detected 3,004 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,936 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 52% (7,686 of 15,765 topics). This Community College is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group. Community College
Topic details
Total words: 3,936
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.2% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst