Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video810 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Command And Control results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 264 hits. Analysis detected 1,745 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,226 of 16,562 topics). This Command And Control is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Command And Control
Topic details
Total words: 3,240
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.3% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos