Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Comeback Victory results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Hindsight Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 501 hits. Analysis detected 2,149 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,728 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,854 topics). This Comeback Victory is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Comeback Victory
Topic details
Total words: 1,728
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.0%29.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 9.0%9.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.6%7.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos