Topic summary
⁠16%1 analyzed article/video959 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Columbia River Basin results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 264 hits. Analysis detected 1,228 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,877 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,360 of 16,562 topics). This Columbia River Basin is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Columbia River Basin
Topic details
Total words: 2,877
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos