Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Colorado River Water Rights results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Appeal to Authority, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 353 hits. Analysis detected 1,947 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Colorado River Water Rights is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Colorado River Water Rights
Topic details
Total words: 2,192
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.6%7.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos