Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,529 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Colorado River Negotiations results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Status Quo Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 1,129 hits. Analysis detected 5,994 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,360 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,236 of 16,562 topics). This Colorado River Negotiations is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Colorado River Negotiations
Topic details
Total words: 5,360
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.3% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.1%21.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Special Pleading: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.3%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos