Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Colombian Cuisine results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Recency Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 493 hits. Analysis detected 2,756 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Colombian Cuisine is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Colombian Cuisine
Topic details
Total words: 2,884
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.1%17.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos