Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video217 analyzed words
BS Summary: These College Football Bowl Season results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Recency Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34.3% saturation with 223 hits. Analysis detected 1,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 651 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,220 of 16,562 topics). This College Football Bowl Season is worse (more manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group.
College Football Bowl Season
Topic details
Total words: 651
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510092.6% percentile
10.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles651 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 26.7%26.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 27.6%27.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 18.9%18.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 15.8%15.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 34.3%34.3%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.6%14.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.4%10.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 34.3%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 27.6%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Topic 26.7%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 18.9%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Red Herring: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos