Topic summary
0% 12 analyzed articles/videos 7,355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These College Basketball results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 4,043 hits . Analysis detected 27,684 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,958 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (11,261 of 15,388 topics). This College Basketball is better (less manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group. College Basketball
Topic details
Total words: 24,958
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score12 analyzed articles25K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 16.2% 16.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst