Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These College Athletics Penalties results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 412 hits. Analysis detected 2,719 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,092 of 16,562 topics). This College Athletics Penalties is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
College Athletics Penalties
Topic details
Total words: 2,044
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.3% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 20.2%20.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.8%17.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.0%14.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 12.7%12.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.5%Red Herring: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos