Topic summary
73% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,748 analyzed words
BS Summary: These College Athletics results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 2,004 hits . Analysis detected 17,159 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,171 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (10,953 of 16,562 topics). This College Athletics is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. College Athletics
Topic details
Total words: 16,171
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles16.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst