Topic summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video849 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coliseum Deal results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 348 hits. Analysis detected 2,154 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,159 of 16,562 topics). This Coliseum Deal is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Coliseum Deal
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,396
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos