Topic summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video1,917 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cold Cases results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Unattributed Quote, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 675 hits. Analysis detected 6,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,751 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,791 of 16,562 topics). This Cold Cases is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Cold Cases
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,751
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.9% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.8%8.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.1%5.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.7%11.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos