Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,089 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coffee results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 386 hits. Analysis detected 3,108 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,356 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,662 of 16,562 topics). This Coffee is better (less manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Coffee
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,356
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos