Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video471 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coco Austin results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 452 hits. Analysis detected 1,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,759 of 15,943 topics). This Coco Austin is worse (more manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.
Coco Austin
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,884
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.4% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 24.0%24.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.7%21.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.0%16.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 24.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos