Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 690 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cocaine Research results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 595 hits . Analysis detected 2,543 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (13,575 of 16,562 topics). This Cocaine Research is better (less manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group. Cocaine Research
Topic details
Total words: 5,528
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.5% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.4% Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst