Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,706 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cocaine results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 594 hits . Analysis detected 4,292 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,868 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (11,064 of 16,562 topics). This Cocaine is better (less manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group. Cocaine
Topic details
Total words: 5,868
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst