Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Coal Industry results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 456 hits. Analysis detected 2,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Coal Industry is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Coal Industry
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,604
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.5%17.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Straw Man: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Middle Ground: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos