Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video728 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climbing results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 546 hits. Analysis detected 2,202 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,912 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,819 of 16,562 topics). This Climbing is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
Climbing
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,912
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.8% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.8%18.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.4%10.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.2%12.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Composition/Division: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos