Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Climate Finance results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 353 hits. Analysis detected 2,543 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,243 topics). This Climate Finance is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Climate Finance
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,068
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 7.1%7.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos