Topic summary
⁠19%1 analyzed article/video1,138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Disasters results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 389 hits. Analysis detected 2,657 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,552 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (11,446 of 15,984 topics). This Climate Disasters is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Climate Disasters
Topic details
Total words: 4,552
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510028.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos