Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Climate Attribution results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 602 hits. Analysis detected 6,734 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,677 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,259 topics). This Climate Attribution is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Climate Attribution
Topic details
Total words: 7,677
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos