Topic summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video1,944 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Adaptation In Schools results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 802 hits. Analysis detected 3,902 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (13,732 of 22,836 topics). This Climate Adaptation In Schools is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Climate Adaptation In Schools
Topic details
Total words: 7,776
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510039.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos