Topic summary
⁠10%1 analyzed article/video3,723 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Adaptation & Resilience results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 973 hits. Analysis detected 6,198 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (15,906 of 16,504 topics). This Climate Adaptation & Resilience is better (less manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group.
Climate Adaptation & Resilience
Topic details
Total words: 14,892
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

4% percentile
02550751003.6% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles14.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.1%5.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos