Topic summary
⁠74%2 analyzed articles/videos383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cleveland Guardians results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 333 hits. Analysis detected 1,792 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,532 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,881 of 16,562 topics). This Cleveland Guardians is worse (more manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group.
Cleveland Guardians
Topic details
Total words: 1,532
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.6% percentile
6.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 21.7%21.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.2%10.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 13.0%13.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos