Topic summary
38%2 analyzed articles/videos485 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clean Air Act results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 400 hits. Analysis detected 2,967 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,570 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (5,795 of 16,562 topics). This Clean Air Act is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Clean Air Act
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,570
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.0% percentile
3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.6%15.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.6%11.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.1%8.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.7%11.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate