Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos159 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clayton Kershaw results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 318 hits. Analysis detected 1,536 faulty-reasoning hits from 477 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (451 of 16,562 topics). This Clayton Kershaw is worse (more manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group.
Clayton Kershaw
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 477
Article count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

97% percentile
025507510097.3% percentile
16.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles477 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 66.7%66.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 38.4%38.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 33.3%33.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 33.1%33.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 43.0%43.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 21.2%21.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 14.9%14.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 9.6%9.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 11.3%11.3%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 66.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 43.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 38.4%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 33.3%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 33.1%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 9.6%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos