Topic summary
53%1 analyzed article/video852 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Classical Theater results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41.3% saturation with 1,408 hits. Analysis detected 3,511 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (6,478 of 16,562 topics). This Classical Theater is worse (more manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group.
Classical Theater
Topic details
Total words: 3,408
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510060.9% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 41.3%41.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.2%13.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 41.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos