Topic summary
⁠23%1 analyzed article/video1,774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Class Theory results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 505 hits. Analysis detected 3,006 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,322 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (14,527 of 16,562 topics). This Class Theory is better (less manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group.
Class Theory
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,322
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

12% percentile
025507510012.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos