Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Class Politics results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 633 hits . Analysis detected 6,131 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,559 topics). This Class Politics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Class Politics
Topic details
Total words: 4,592
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.0% 13.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst