Topic summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video1,914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Class Consciousness results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Biased Writer Voice, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 699 hits. Analysis detected 6,385 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,956 of 16,562 topics). This Class Consciousness is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Class Consciousness
Topic details
Total words: 7,656
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.1%9.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.4%5.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos