Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,450 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civilian Resilience results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 570 hits. Analysis detected 4,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,443 of 16,562 topics). This Civilian Resilience is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Civilian Resilience
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠37%Civilian Resilience (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,800
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.8%9.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos