Topic summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video1,698 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cityscape results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 1,552 hits. Analysis detected 6,797 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,792 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,755 of 16,562 topics). This Cityscape is better (less manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Cityscape
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,792
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.1% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.9%22.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.8%12.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos