Topic summary
⁠10%1 analyzed article/video615 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Citizen Science Projects results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 214 hits. Analysis detected 1,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,788 of 16,452 topics). This Citizen Science Projects is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Citizen Science Projects
Topic details
Total words: 2,460
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.6% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.8%6.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos