Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video238 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cincinnati Zoo Incident results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 970 faulty-reasoning hits from 952 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (2,895 of 15,149 topics). This Cincinnati Zoo Incident is worse (more manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
Cincinnati Zoo Incident
Topic details
Total words: 952
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.9% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles952 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 9.4%9.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.7%Bandwagon: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos