Topic summary
45% 1 analyzed article/video 924 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cincinnati Reds results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Halo Effect , and Recency Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 427 hits . Analysis detected 1,382 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,696 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 37% (14,920 of 23,475 topics). This Cincinnati Reds is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group. Cincinnati Reds
Topic details
Total words: 3,696
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst