Topic summary
45%1 analyzed article/video924 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cincinnati Reds results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Halo Effect, and Recency Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 427 hits. Analysis detected 1,382 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,696 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 37% (14,920 of 23,475 topics). This Cincinnati Reds is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Cincinnati Reds
Topic details
Total words: 3,696
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.6%11.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos