Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chuck Schumer results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 2,049 hits. Analysis detected 11,715 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Chuck Schumer is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Chuck Schumer
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,804
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.6%11.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.9%20.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos