Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,962 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christofascism results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 3,636 hits . Analysis detected 21,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 68% (5,315 of 16,562 topics). This Christofascism is worse (more manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group. Christofascism
Topic details
Total words: 11,848
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.9% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 30.7% 30.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 26.8% 26.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 9.2% 9.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.7%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 26.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst