Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video2,962 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christofascism results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 3,636 hits. Analysis detected 21,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 68% (5,315 of 16,562 topics). This Christofascism is worse (more manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
Christofascism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,848
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510067.9% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 30.7%30.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.8%26.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.4%12.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.7%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos