Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video908 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christian Kirk results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.8% saturation with 813 hits. Analysis detected 4,726 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,724 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,696 of 16,562 topics). This Christian Kirk is worse (more manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Christian Kirk
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,724
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.7% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 22.4%22.4%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 8.7%8.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 29.9%29.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 29.9%, sitewide 26.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Horn Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.6%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos