Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,004 analyzed words
BS Summary: These China's Global Strategy results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Overconfidence Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 939 hits. Analysis detected 7,354 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,801 of 16,482 topics). This China's Global Strategy is better (less manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
China's Global Strategy
Topic details
Total words: 8,016
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.5% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.7%11.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos