Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These China Taiwan Relations results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 478 hits. Analysis detected 2,266 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,408 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,937 of 16,562 topics). This China Taiwan Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
China Taiwan Relations
Topic details
Total words: 2,408
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.2% percentile
4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.9%19.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.8%6.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos