Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos423 analyzed words
BS Summary: These China Relations results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Burden of Proof, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 427 hits. Analysis detected 5,162 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,237 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,113 of 16,562 topics). This China Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group.
China Relations
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,237
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.1% percentile
4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 10.1%10.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.9%7.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.2%13.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.4%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos